Home   |   Agreement   |   Partners   |   International   |   Tests   |   News   |   Glossary   |   Contacts   
 

Kertitox Fullspray 3000/24
Kertitox  Fullspray 3000/24
Manufactured by: FARMGÉP KFT
Category: crop protection sprayers - boom sprayers
ENTAM recognised: YES
Testing partner: HIAE
Date: 2011
Recognition: The test report carried out by MGI - FVM Mezogazdasági Gépesítési Intézet (MGI test code: H_ENTAM_3_2010) related to the single-axle trailed sprayer Farmgép Kft Kertitox Fullspray 3000/24 has been ENTAM RECOGNIZED (ENTAM recognition n. 1/2011).
The recognitions numbers are the following:

AUSTRIA (Francisco Josephinum Wieselburg – BLT): 004/11;
DENMARK (Aarhus Universitet, Department of Agricultural Engineering - AU/DAE): AU DAE ENTAM 2011-12;
FRANCE (Cemagref): CEMAGREF/ENTAM/11/019;
GERMANY (Julius Kühn-Institut - JKI): ENT-HU-03/10;
GREECE (N.AG.RE.F - National Agricultural Research
Foundation): ΛE/146/01/ZZ
ITALY (Ente Nazionale per la Meccanizzazione Agricola – ENAMA): ENTAM "Rapporto di prova prestazionale" 1/2011;
POLAND (Przemyslowy Instytut Maszyn Rolniczych): PIMR-56/ENTAM/10;
SPAIN (Centre de Mecanització Agrŕria – CMA): EPH002/10.
SWITZERLAND (Forschungsanstalt Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon - ART): H-02.11
Test documentation: ENTAM_recognition_1.pdf
Test_Report_ENTAM_ 1_2011.pdf
Additional information and notes: Explanation on testing
Testing takes place according to a procedure which was
developed by the competent testing authorities of the European
countries participating in ENTAM. This procedure is based on
the CEN standard EN 12761 „Agricultural and forestry
machinery – Plant protection equipment for the application of
plant protection products and liquid fertilisers”. The tests were
conducted according to the Technical Instructions (TI) for
ENTAM-Tests of Field Crop Sprayers (Rel. 3 & Rel 4 -draft-).
This test is only a technical performance test which takes place
without an accompanying field test. The test results apply only
to the tested appurtenances of the sprayer. Statements on the
behaviour of the sprayer with different appurtenances cannot
be derived from these results.
 
Images: